In: Nielsen, M.; Simpson, D.: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1825: 21st International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets (ICATPN 2000), Aarhus, Denmark, June 2000, pages 187-206. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
Abstract: Timed-arc Petri nets (TAPN's) are not Turing powerful, because, in particular, they cannot simulate a counter with zero testing. Thus, we could think that this model does not increase significantly the expressiveness of untimed Petri nets. But this is not true; in a previous paper we have shown that the differences between them are big enough to make the reachability problem undecidable. On the other hand, coverability and boundedness are proved now to be decidable. This fact is a consequence of the close interrelationship between TAPN's and transfer nets, for which similar results have been recently proved. Finally, we see that if dead tokens are defined as those that cannot be used for firing any transition in the future, we can detect these kind of tokens in an effective way.
Back to the Petri Nets Bibliography